Posted by: Peter | 30 November 2008

A UofC kerfuffle

Since it happened in my local neighborhood, I thought the story below, presented in chronological order, may be of some interest.

University of Calgary Once Again Attempting to Censor Campus Pro-Life Club
University of Calgary Pro-Life Students Defy Threats of Arrest over Pro-Life Display
High-ranking Political Science Profs Say U of C “Overreacted” To Pro-Life Demonstrators
University of Calgary Pro-Life Students Victorious (for now - ed) - Administration Backs Down from Arrest Threats

Such stories are only really a surprise if you subscribe to the old canard that universities are all about ‘free speech’, ‘open enquiry’, ‘thoughtful discourse’ etc. Simply put, that is a fiction and fallacy. I have two degrees, and I never saw universities like this. Usually they are hotbeds of ‘rightthink’, ideology of which swallowed by many (not all - but many) immature people who really don’t have much of a clue, or interest in finding one. Full of people required to jump through lecturers hoops to get the grades needed and hardly able, interested or encouraged to study further.

Sorry for the rant (not one of my better days, alas). Everything is broken, universities included, and only Jesus Christ can redeem us.

Posted by: Peter | 23 November 2008

On worship

Why do we worship God, or why does He require worship? Is He insecure, requiring affirmation from His creation? Or could it be an ego trip? Or do we worship just to remain in His ‘good books’? I do not wish to be offensive, but these are questions that are out there and require an answer.

The truth is, none of those answers to the question of “why worship?” come close to the mark. What is worship, but the attribution of worth? The English word “worship” comes from two Old English words: weorth, which means “worth,” and scipe or ship, which means something like shape or “quality.”

Consider the sunrise below. Is it not beautiful and praise-worthy? How much more so then is God!

The point being, that praise is intrinsic to the object.

Sunrise 2

Posted by: Peter | 15 November 2008

On understanding

How often do we wrestle with understanding in situations where there are only half answers, at best? Perhaps the reason that God does not always give us understanding on demand is so that we can choose Him by faith rather than resting and relying on our own understanding in our own strength.

Seeking to question something is a valid activity, and sometimes answers are granted to us, but the question is where ultimately do we put our faith? Do we put our faith and trust in God whether we understand or not? Or is our faith in our own understanding?

The problem with the latter is that it is not a reliable place to stand - we see only as if through a glass, and that dimly. So I perceive that God sometimes (you may say often) does not answer the questions so that our trust may reside, often through struggle, in a place that will never be shaken.

Posted by: Peter | 5 November 2008

Change

I’m fairly wary of treading into the political arena, but yesterday I had a vision that continues to burden me. As I prayed briefly for the elections down south, I had a picture pop into my mind:

I saw prairie grass but this grass was burnt black. In the middle was a kidney shaped patch of unburned brown grass (the colour grass turns in the north in the winter).

I do not offer a definitive interpretation, but I do offer some thoughts. For the black burnt grass, I sense evil, darkness, death and a burden of grief. The brown remnant - dormant, dead in a sense but perhaps capable of being brought to life? Also consider 1 Peter 1 v24 “For all men are like grass, and all their glory is like the flowers of the field; the grass withers and the flowers fall”.

Possibly related is my continuing and deepening sense of unease about this word that is currently being bandied about: “change”. The thing is - change, yes - but to what end?

It seems as if there are those captivated with style over substance, to whom such a word connects with a feeling that things are not right (with which I would agree). But rather than enquire more deeply, they are satisfied with the slogan and the emotion attached to it.

Do we know where we are going? Not all change is for the good.

Posted by: Peter | 1 November 2008

By faith

Recently I was reading Hebrews 11, the great chapter that talks about faith, and got to pondering how often we misunderstand the nature of faith.

The rather wry comment has been made that “faith is believing something that isn’t true”. How many of us carry something of that around with us, that we have to try really hard to believe something that is somewhat improbable at best.

If that is our definition of faith, then I would suggest that we are believing a lie. Let me give you a better definition: faith is about trust and relationship.

I would observe that those who dismiss or deride ‘faith’ as though the one holding the faith was somehow mentally retarded, are blind to their own reality. For, it is almost certain that they themselves hold faith in one or more things. It is difficult, for example, to be married without faith. It is a requirement for a stable relationship to be able to trust that your spouse will not be cheating on you when your back is turned. Do you know this? No, but hopefully you have faith that it is so, based on experience.

Perhaps this is what we lack, in our fallen state - the experience of the loving goodness of our Father God. Having turned from Him, having not known Him or His ways, it is hard to trust or have faith in Him. That’s why faith in our living God is sometimes described as a leap, or as Philip Yancey put it: “Faith means believing in advance what will only make sense in reverse”.

If you do not know God as a loving Father, and if you do not know the salvation of Jesus, and if you do not know the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit, then I strongly encourage you to make that leap of faith today. This is a faith that leads to life, and life in all of its fullness.

Posted by: Peter | 22 October 2008

Thy will be done

Tonight, I find myself somewhat at a loss for words. Earlier, I read this article, chronicling the true outcome of gay marriage. Rather than it being about granting equal rights, allowing for tolerance / diversity etc, the true face is much darker; precious little tolerance or diversity can be found for those who would object to their children being indoctrinated contrary to their beliefs. I quote you a little:

By the following year it was in elementary school curricula. Kindergartners were given picture books telling them that same-sex couples are just another kind of family, like their own parents. In 2005, when David Parker of Lexington, MA – a parent of a kindergartner – strongly insisted on being notified when teachers were discussing homosexuality or transgenderism with his son, the school had him arrested and put in jail overnight.

Second graders at the same school were read a book, “King and King”, about two men who have a romance and marry each other, with a picture of them kissing. When parents Rob and Robin Wirthlin complained, they were told that the school had no obligation to notify them or allow them to opt-out their child.

In 2006 the Parkers and Wirthlins filed a federal Civil Rights lawsuit to force the schools to notify parents and allow them to opt-out their elementary-school children when homosexual-related subjects were taught. The federal judges dismissed the case. The judges ruled that because same-sex marriage is legal in Massachusetts, the school actually had a duty to normalize homosexual relationships to children, and that schools have no obligation to notify parents or let them opt-out their children! Acceptance of homosexuality had become a matter of good citizenship!

Think about that: Because same-sex marriage is “legal”, a federal judge has ruled that the schools now have a duty to portray homosexual relationships as normal to children, despite what parents think or believe!

Then, the following news from the UK:

WESTMINSTER, October 22, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) – U.K. pro-life campaigners were deeply saddened at tonight’s vote on the Labour government’s Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill. MPs voted 355 to 129 to pass the bill that allows human/animal embryos to be created by cloning and used in experiments.

The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) condemned the vote, saying, “Future generations would regard the bill as devaluing human life.” SPUC said they will raise the issue during the next general election.

Besides allowing the creation of cloned human/animal embryos for experimentation, the bill will enshrine in law all the individual permissions given in the last 16 years by the UK’s Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. It will allow homosexual partners to have children created for them in IVF labs after it abolishes the requirement that doctors consider the “need for a father” in artificial procreation treatments. It allows the creation of children, called “saviour siblings,” to be used as tissue donors for siblings, and permits the genetic manipulation of embryos for eugenic purposes. Earlier this week, it was also revealed that the government plans to use the bill to allow the creation of human clones from tissues taken from mentally incapacitated patients who cannot give consent.

There is a darkness and evil abroad in our land, and with its increasing ascendancy, its true nature is revealed. So many are malleable, having no strong beliefs of their own, they are easily swayed by the appeal for tolerance, as well as the increasing pressure to conform to the newthink. Therefore, it is easy for those who have grabbed the reigns of power to run roughshod over a vestigial societal unease and enforce a new morality.

In all this, my heart goes out to the children, who are being used as the pawns - fit for indoctrination over the objections of their parents, fit to be experimented on - socially and medically, fit to be born as a donor for a sibling, fit to have their essence melded with an animal for increasingly macabre experimentation. I ask, have we all gone mad? Perhaps this is the natural state of man, having rejected God we become lower than beasts, rivaling devils in the pursuit of evil.

I have been, on and off for years, pleading that the Lord in the midst of His justice would remember mercy. Today, I find myself an an impasse. How can I pray for mercy, that such things may continue? They are manifestations of a dark, wicked evil, the tentacles of demonic oppression covering the land. Can I pray for mercy on a society that cradles and cherishes such things? I do not know any longer how to pray.

Perhaps it may just be “Lord, thy will be done, thy kingdom come, on Earth as it is in Heaven”.

Posted by: Peter | 1 October 2008

I will restore

A couple of days ago, I felt the Lord pointing out the following verse, from Amos 9 v11 and referred to in Acts 15 v16-17. I had read the verse in Acts that morning, and received the Amos reference from a friend in another context later in the day.

In that day I will restore
David’s fallen tent.
I will repair its broken places,
restore its ruins,
and build it as it used to be.

This is a message of hope in times of extreme shaking. The Lord says ‘I will restore’. God is not the god of hopelessness, nor is He the god of fear. Whatever our current state, He has in mind a glorious restoration. But note friends, this may not be restoration in the form we envisage. God’s restoration, much like His ways and thoughts, are not the same as ours. He will build it as it used to be, not the way we have made it.

Posted by: Peter | 22 September 2008

Have salt in yourselves

Despite being away last week, I have kept up with current world events, in particular the financial crises rocking the world. It is no surprise to me, nor do I find any joy in it. To my mind, it is and continues to be a painful and tragic necessity. Any long term readers know that the Lord has been warning us over a period of years, both here and in many other places, as to what would unfold.

My mind goes back to September 2006, in this post:

It is the twilight of the current age, and we bask in its fading gleams. Much that can be shaken, soon will be.

So do we see the shaking now? I would submit that we do, and there is yet more to come. Just as a Tsunami is not made up of one big wave but a number of waves, so we see the successive and larger waves crashing the shores of our indulgence.

It may be that the latest wave passes, leaving us feeling safe until the next one hits us, seemly out of nowhere. I do not know the timing, that is not my purpose and mission. The purpose is to warn, that we might be prepared. Do not think I am one of the prophets of doom, who delight in pronouncing judgment on everybody else, snug in their secure bunker. No, I have a family, a job, a church fellowship; I’m just an everyman. I do not expect the be aloof or unaffected by the storms.

What I say is the same as over the years - there is only one safe place, only one refuge as we discover our house of cards is not as secure as our pretense would like to make it be. The safe place? Christ alone! Christ alone! Christ alone in the Mercy judgement to come. Only He will be unshaken, only He can offer a place of refuge. The world will fail - He will remain. Therefore friends, purchase the Salt now while you can, that you might “have salt in yourselves, and peace with each other” (Mark 9 v50b).

PS - Perhaps of interest, I came across this today as I was preparing the post.

Posted by: Peter | 22 September 2008

Why you should visit the Canadian Rockies in September

I rest my case.

Posted by: Peter | 7 September 2008

The Lambeth Whitewash

Ezekiel 13 v10-12
They lead my people astray, saying, “Peace,” when there is no peace, and because, when a flimsy wall is built, they cover it with whitewash, therefore tell those who cover it with whitewash that it is going to fall. Rain will come in torrents, and I will send hailstones hurtling down, and violent winds will burst forth. When the wall collapses, will people not ask you, “Where is the whitewash you covered it with?”

The word of God is uncompromising. Like a sharp double-edged sword, it is intended to cleave truth from error, cutting beneath our obfuscations, our evasions, our deceits and outright denials. It is intended to bring us face to face with the truth, the reality we hide from day to day. And it is only after we are confronted with the truth of who we are, in sharp painful honesty, that it offers us hope – a hope beyond all hope.

Where do we, as Anglicans, stand in relation to this? It is a tragedy that Lambeth – where the Church called the Anglican Communion, faced with a crossroads, gathered together for counsel – should have failed so deeply in purpose, in leadership, in clarity and in moral courage. Rather than discerning the truth through the uncompromising word of God and then acting upon it, the ‘truth’ discussed was weak, distorted and nuanced, and no courage was found to act upon it.

2 Corinthians 6 v14
Do not be yoked together with unbelievers. For what do righteousness and wickedness have in common? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness?

What does this passage teach us other than, having discerned between righteousness and wickedness, we should act upon that discernment? Or do we not have the courage of the convictions that our faith lays upon us? Jesus said His yoke is light - but a yoke it is nonetheless. Those who profess faith in Him must wear this yoke.

We should not love the organisation so much that we forget that the organisation exists only at the pleasure and for the purposes of God. A comfortable time for Bishops, a collegiality expressed, may be all well and good, but if it is at the expense of the body of Christ, it is little more than soothing platitudes offered to a sick patient by those who have the ability and authority to direct the cure.

Revelation 3 v15-16
I know your deeds, that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either one or the other! So, because you are lukewarm—neither hot nor cold—I am about to spit you out of my mouth.

Revelation 2 v5b
If you do not repent, I will come to you and remove your lampstand from its place.

The words of the gentle Christ – meek and mild. Far be it for Him to overturn the money tables, and whip the interlopers out of the temple! Which Christ would we follow? The real Christ as revealed in the Bible? Or would we prefer a Christ who would hide behind platitudes, behind circumlocution, behind collegiality, behind committees and behind an organisation?

We are told that the Lambeth conference was expressly designed not to make decisions, but to rebuild trust and confidence in Anglicanism. Well, what do we make of this? Regarding the first aim, we must adjudge it a success. No decisions could have been passed in a meeting so manipulated to achieve nothing of significance.

Regarding the second aim, rebuilding ‘trust and confidence’, perhaps we may answer with a question. On what foundation is Anglicanism based? Should we rejoice in the friendship amongst Bishops, or should we desire the friendship of Christ? Without the Cornerstone, the rest is mere chasing after the wind.

Let us submit then, that in as much as the conference aims were towards a lukewarm outcome, they were remarkably successful. As an example of an abdication of responsibility and authority, Lambeth ended on a high note.

So what now? It is hard to escape the conclusion that the lampstand now passes to others who will be willing to make the hard decisions and difficult choices that will lead to the restoration of the sick patient and the eventual repair of the tear in the fabric of the life of the Church.

Older Posts »

Categories